The Effectiveness of Bottom-Up Vs. Top-Down Approaches in Goal Setting

Posted by:

|

On:

|

The ongoing debate about the effectiveness of bottom-up vs. top-down approaches in goal setting is intriguing. In the context of the healthcare and manufacturing industries, a top-down approach often proves more effective, as Kyla Mintz’s article illustrates. The suitability of either approach can depend significantly on a company’s structure and regulatory environment. In a top-down approach, the company’s vision, mission, and values guide the establishment of goals and objectives, aligning them closely with overall company expectations and departmental targets. This method provides a clear understanding of each department’s contribution to the company’s strategic plan, particularly in areas crucial to these industries, such as safety requirements and regulatory compliance. These are vital for achieving better patient outcomes in healthcare and reducing manufacturing defects and liabilities. Employee engagement is still essential to success. When employees understand and value their role in achieving the company’s objectives, they tend to feel more responsible, accomplished, and connected to the organization. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ppingel_top-down-vs-bottom-up-2024-strategies-activity-7136958723096264704-L3Js?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Posted by

in